Newsletter for Summer 2001
Newsletter Archive Or if you prefer, you can download in pdf format.
| Editorial
- On
24th May 1997, a car driven by a woman
insured by Provident Insurance plc hit eight year
old Darren Coombes, cycling to a friend’s house
near Sandown in the Isle of Wight. Darren suffered
severe brain damage, was in hospital for 3 months
and was given a 25% chance of survival. Now he is 12
but has the mental age of an eight year old. Darren’s parents sued the driver for damages. Provident lodged a counter claim for negligence claiming he was not adequately supervised and should have been wearing a helmet. This counter claim affected not only Darren’s parents but also Mrs Cole, a childminder who was looking after Darren on the day of the accident. If they lost the case the Coombes would have become bankrupt. The case was due to come to court in Feb 2000. If pursued along those grounds by PI it would have made legal history. But the action by PI was so unusual that it brought media attention and offers of help from barristers, expert witnesses and the CTC. On 24th January 2001 Kevin Mayne CEO of the CTC wrote an open letter to Mr Bell the Chief Executive of Provident plc. He asked a series of simple questions:
|
None
of the CTC’s specific questions were answered.
Meanwhile hundreds of concerned people and many
cyclists wrote to Provident Insurance. Many cancelled
their policies and in Bradford local cyclists
considered an action outside the offices of PI to draw
attention to the case. On 19th February PI
withdrew their action against Mr and Mrs Coombs and
Mrs Cole. They said: |
|
|
|
|
Campaign Corner - Campaigning for cycling facilities is seen by some simply as hardened cyclists trying to grab a share of limited resources, such as local authority funding and road space. If there is to be a reduction in congestion, mostly caused by the dominance of the private car in personal transport, then bicycle usage has to be a significant factor. Is it possible to attract people out of their cars? Is it possible that people will be forced out of their cars by the fact that travel by car, particularly for short journeys, will be such an unpleasant experience (a bumper to bumper crawl, followed by a lengthy search for a parking place) that they will look for an alternative? I believe that the principal objective of campaigning for cycling facilities is to ensure that, as the inevitable grind towards gridlock causes drivers to think twice about using the car, there is a viable alternative, there will be choice. With Canterbury’s road conditions being what they are, I very rarely use my car to go into town on a Saturday. This is possible because the facilities that have been provided mean that I can choose my mode of transport. For me, campaigning is about providing options. |
|
| Do
your bit for the Kyoto Agreement
By Andy McNally |
The British government
has signed up to the Kyoto Agreement, which means
that it has pledged to reduce CO2 emissions to 8%
below 1990 levels by 2008. How can you help achieve
this? Well, there are four principal ways.
Use alternative energy sources. Solar panels, wind turbines and hydro-electric turbines all harness natural energy and don’t produce CO2 emissions in use. The only one of these that is normally applicable to the individual is the solar panel. Improve insulation. Energy generation emissions are reduced if we make more efficient use of energy, but will we see the difference that we make? Improve the efficiency of internal combustion engines. In the last 30 years, engine efficiency has improved by something like 80%. Of course, all of that improvement has been lost in increased usage. There is still much potential for improvement, but we can’t wait another 30 years. Reduce the use of the internal combustion engine. At last, here is something where we can all make a difference. If, one day a week, you leave your car at home and ride your bike to work, you will be making a 20% cut in your commuting CO2 emissions; here and now, not in 30 years time, not dependant on manufacturers, energy suppliers or anyone else. I ride my bike to work one day a week for the duration of British Summer Time. Why not five days a week or in the Winter I hear you say. Well, there are three reasons. First, living in Sturry and working in Dover, my trip to work and back is around 40 hilly miles. Second, I’m the wrong side of 50 and parts of me don’t always work as well as they once did. Third, I don’t like cycling in the rain. What? A fair weather cyclist as well! Why not? Cycling should be a pleasure, not something that is endured. I am lucky that my employer has provided shower facilities, so I don’t sit at my desk in sweaty clothes and smelling like a polecat. However, if your commute is around the average (five miles or less), it is possible to pootle along and avoid the need for special clothing or a hosing-down on arrival. So, choose your day carefully (even the average British Summer doesn’t normally produce five consecutive days of rain) and start cutting those emissions, right now. You won’t be on your own. |
|
|
|
|
Throwing
caution to the wind Just before George Dubya Bush announced that he considered the US economy more important than the threat of climate change to the rest of the world, Sir Chrispin Tickell told the Associate Group on Architecture and Planning meeting at the House of Commons that the world needed "some useful catastrophe to jerk us out of our inertia: big, but not too big." To back his arguments he quoted the following figures:
None of
these figures appear to have made the slightest dent
in Dubbya’s enthusiasms. He has thrown caution to
the wind as America increases its CO2 emission
levels without a care in the world. Sam Webb |